Assessing Future Climate Trends: Downscaling Maximum Temperature for Water and Agricultural Management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Climate change represents a serious challenge to agricultural systems around the world, as increasing temperatures and changing rainfall patterns impact crop yields, water supply, and ecosystems. Accurate forecasts of future daily maximum temperatures (Tmax) are vital for evaluating how vulnerable agricultural systems are to climate change. Rising Tmax can result in heat stress for crops, heightened water use in crops, diminished yields, and alterations in crop developmental timelines. Grasping the projected Tmax is crucial for recognizing potential threats to crop production, maintaining food security, and developing sound agricultural policies. To analyze upcoming climate changes, Global Circulation Models (GCMs) are beneficial. Nonetheless, GCMs reveal broad climate trends but do not capture local variations in Tmax that influence agriculture. For example, in Aurangabad, local Tmax variations have a substantial effect on crop development, water needs, and harvest yields. To address this issue, downscaling methods are useful. These methods transform broad-scale data into more precise, local Tmax figures. This study employs the Random Forest (RF) algorithm, an effective machine learning approach, to statistically downscale Tmax projections for Aurangabad, India, utilizing the CMIP5 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5) CanESM2 (Canadian Earth System Model, Version 2) GCM, which is a Canadian climate model that furnishes global climatic data for future projections. The Random Forest algorithm functions by identifying patterns from historical data, allowing it to make future predictions, which makes it well-suited for intricate, non-linear relationships within climate information. The CanESM2 model was selected for its expansive coverage and its demonstrated capability to yield precise regional climate forecasts, making it well-suited for this research. The CanESM2 model generates future climatic information on a global scale. By combining observed Tmax data with pertinent large-scale climate variables from the CMIP5 CanESM2 model, the Random Forest model was created and validated. Following successful calibration and validation of the model, it was applied to downscale future Tmax scenarios under three Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs): RCP 2.6, RCP 4.5, and RCP 8.5 for three future time frames the 2020s, 2050s, and 2080s. The findings reveal a considerable warming trend in Tmax across all scenarios, with the most notable warming expected under the RCP 8.5 scenario compared to the baseline period of 1961-2005. These results underscore the need for adapting agricultural practices to future climatic conditions, assisting local farmers and policymakers in preparing for the rising challenges presented by climate change. These results offer essential insights for agricultural stakeholders in Aurangabad to evaluate the potential effects of climate change on crop production, devise strategies to mitigate heat stress, and adopt climate-smart agricultural practices to bolster resilience and assure food security in the region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".