MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410136924 · doi:10.1017/s000344520900381x

Victimization and Predatory Violence Among Street Youth in Toronto, Canada

2009· article· en· W4410136924 on OpenAlexaffabout
Patricia G. Erickson, Jennifer E. Butters, Tara Bruno

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Annals of Criminology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyCriminologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract International studies show consistently that street-involved or homeless youth have elevated levels of involvement in violence, both as victim and perpetrator. This study recruited equal numbers of male (n=75) and female (n=75) youth, aged 16-20 years, who were accessing service for street-involved youth in Toronto, Canada. This paper examines the correlates of their experiences of violent victimization and perpetration, applying both bivariate and multivariate analyses. We find that because so many of the risk factors for youth violence in general are already concentrateci in street youth, it is difficult to identify additional attributes that clearly differentiate the youth who are most likely to be implicated in violence. Some links however were found. Specifically, being male, having a mental health diagnosis, selling drugs and carrying a knife or a gun were associated with victimization, and carrying a knife and selling drugs 50+ times in the past year were significant factors in the more frequent perpetration of violence against others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Annals of CriminologySame topicHomelessness and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207