DEVELOPMENT OF A STANDARDIZED PROJECTILE FOR KENLW
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The NATO STANREC 4744 outlines test methodologies for assessing kinetic energy nonlethal weapons (KENLW). The current validation process uses a commercially available projectile, but it has drawbacks: relatively high cost, limited availability in the USA and Canada, and lack of control over the projectile's consistency. To address these issues, a standardized Non-Lethal Bullet Simulating Projectile is proposed. Three candidates are considered: foam top and plastic body (FDM 3D printing), fully resin (SLA 3D printing) and fully plastic (FDM 3D printing). The goal is to identify a candidate that ensures availability, reproducibility, and repeatability for validating and calibrating surrogates. The selected solution will be tested on current surrogates to ensure that it meets these requirements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it