MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410143052 · doi:10.1016/j.msksp.2026.103567

Which Functional Activities Matter Most to the Patients During the First Six Months after Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Survey Study

2025· preprint· en· W4410143052 on OpenAlex
Motahareh Karimijashni, Marie Westby, Paul E. Beaulé, Tim Ramsay, Forough Abtahi, Simon Garceau, Stéphane Poitras

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueMusculoskeletal Science and Practice · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal HealthOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersOttawa HospitalOntario Physiotherapy AssociationUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsArthroplastyPhysical therapyMedicineTotal knee arthroplastyHip arthroplastyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Understanding what matters most to patients can help clinicians plan healthcare more responsive to patients' needs after orthopedic surgery. However, there is still little understanding of which activities patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty prioritize at different time points after surgery.Purpose: This study aimed to explore key functional activities from patients’ perspectives at different timepoints during the first six months after hip or knee arthroplasty.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at The Ottawa Hospital in Ottawa, Canada. Patients who underwent hip or knee arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis (OA) were recruited. A validated self-report questionnaire based on the activity and participation components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) core set for osteoarthritis was used.Results: A total of 953 patients participated, including 503 hip arthroplasty patients and 450 knee arthroplasty patients. Patients identified 23 key functional activities and 26 non-key functional activities within 2 weeks, at six, 13, and 26 weeks post-arthroplasty. Patients highlighted different key activities across various stages following hip or knee arthroplasty, with a decline in the number of key activities over time. During the acute recovery phase, patients focused on simpler activities such as walking short distances and self-care, progressing to more advanced activities like squatting and walking long distances as recovery advanced. The findings revealed similar key activities between patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty.Conclusion: The study identified how patients' perspective on key activities changed over different recovery stages following hip or knee arthroplasty. Understanding what matters most to patients enables clinicians to assess outcomes more accurately as well as adapt interventions that align with patients’ needs in order to optimize time to recovery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it