MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410150356 · doi:10.1353/document.4831

INTERNIERUNGSLAGER (ILAG) GIROMAGNY

2022· reference-entry· en· W4410150356 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexander Kruglov, Dallas Michelbacher

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Germans established an internment camp (Ilag) for enemy civilians in Giromagny, France (near Belfort), on November 15, 1943, from the staff of the former Ilag VIII (map 2). The camp was subordinate to the Armed Forces Commander France (Wehrmachtsbefehlshaber Frankreich). Ilag Giromagny primarily held British and Commonwealth citizens who had been living in continental Western Europe when the war broke out. As of February 1, 1944, there were 980 internees in the camp, 904 of whom were from Britain and the Commonwealth—835 from the United Kingdom, 41 from Canada, 20 from Australia, 5 from South Africa, 2 from New Zealand, and 1 from India. The 76 other internees were American.1 The camp was located in a former French army barracks, which was later used by German forces after they occupied Giromagny in 1940. The camp contained nine stone barracks, 56 meter by 16 meter (184 feet by 53 feet), with tile roofs. The larger rooms within the barracks had three electric lights, while the s...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1180.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWorld Wars: History, Literature, and ImpactFrench-language works237,207