MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410152856 · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2025.3567807

Opportunistic Scheduling With Beam Focusing in Distributed RIS-Aided MU-MIMO Systems

2025· article· en· W4410152856 on OpenAlexaff
Youssef Hussein, Mohamad Assaad, Thierry Clessienne

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsXenon Pharmaceuticals (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMIMOScheduling (production processes)Computer scienceDistributed computingEngineeringTelecommunicationsOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a novel cooperative framework for distributed Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces (RISs) in MU-MIMO systems, aimed at enhancing adaptability and performance. Multiple RISs are strategically deployed to ensure Line-of-Sight (LoS) connectivity with the Base Station (BS) and among each other, thereby improving coverage in traditionally weak zones. Each RIS can dynamically switch between acting as a main RIS (mRIS) to directly serve users or as an intermediate RIS (iRIS) to relay signals to another mRIS. A key contribution of this work is the optimization of mRIS phase shifts using a statistical RIS response function to enhance signal strength. Additionally, iRIS configurations utilize a beam focusing codebook for efficient signal transmission. An opportunistic scheduling scheme based on Lyapunov optimization adapts to user distribution and network conditions to optimize the use of the resulting spatial multiplexing gains, ensuring fairness and stability. Two scheduling policies are proposed: Slot-Based RIS Operational Mode Assignment (SB-ROMA) for high adaptability and Coherence-Time RIS Operational Mode Assignment (CT-ROMA) for reduced computational overhead. Analytical and simulation results validate the effectiveness of the proposed designs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications SocietySame topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207