MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410153305 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2025.3566035

High-Traversability and Precise Navigation for Mobile Robots in Constrained Environments

2025· article· en· W4410153305 on OpenAlexaff
Muhua Zhang, Lei Ma, Ying Wu, Kai Shen, Yongkui Sun, Henry Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMobile robotRobotComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an integrated sensing-planning navigation system for mobile robots used in industrial inspection. The system can be directly integrated with real robots. It enables the robot to pass through tight spaces, circumvent unexpected obstacles, and accurately reach the goal pose. This improves the robot’s adaptability to inspection tasks. For obstacle sensing, the system includes an obstacle parameterizer. Static obstacles in global grid map occupancy clusters are convexified. To improve the representation accuracy of the tight space, continuous and angled obstacles are automatically segmented into multiple convex polygons. This avoids inappropriate convex shapes. Unexpected obstacles in local grid maps are first represented by minimum bounding circles (MBCs) to simplify data association. They are then converted into inscribed convex polygons to ensure consistency with static obstacle descriptions. For motion planning, the system utilizes a two-stage planner operating on obstacle convex sets. When the robot is distant from the goal, the nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) is constrained by inter-convex set discrete-time control barrier functions (DCBF-Convex), termed NMPC-DCBF-Convex, enabling effective navigation in tight spaces and around unexpected obstacles. As the robot nears the goal pose, DCBF-Convex conditions prune the sampling space of dynamic window approach (DWA), termed DWA-DCBF-Convex. It ensures high-frequency control and enables safe and precise arrival at the goal in constrained environments. Experiments in constrained scenarios validate the system’s real-world effectiveness. An inspection robot weighing over 70kg completes challenging navigation tasks at a maximum velocity of 0.5m/s, achieving an empirical terminal positional error of ±0.017m.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.280
Threshold uncertainty score0.461

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207