Analysis and Diagnosis of the Stator Turn-to-Turn Short-Circuit Faults in Wound-Rotor Synchronous Generators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we introduce a health parameter and estimation algorithm to assess the severity of stator turn-to-turn/inter-turn short-circuit (TTSC) faults in wound-rotor synchronous generators (WRSG). Our methodology establishes criteria for evaluating the severity of stator TTSC faults in WRSG and provides a specific solution for estimating both the severity of these faults and the resultant power loss. Our assessment methodology directly reflects the intrinsic impact of stator TTSC faults on the WRSG, offering enhanced efficiency, accuracy, and resilience to interference compared with traditional methods in estimating and gauging the TTSC severity. First, we demonstrate that it is impossible to determine the two fault parameters of the WRSG stator TTSC faults solely based on the voltage and current measurements. Subsequently, we introduce a novel health parameter for the WRSG stator TTSC faults and show that for a given generator and load, the dynamics of voltage and current during these faults as well as the resulting power loss are determined by this health parameter. We then detail the characteristics of the proposed health parameter and criteria for evaluating the severity of the WRSG stator TTSC faults. Furthermore, we present an estimation algorithm that is capable of accurately estimating the health parameter and power loss, demonstrating its minimal estimation error. Finally, we provide a comprehensive set of simulation results, including Monte Carlo results, to validate our proposed methodology and illustrate that our approach offers significant improvements in terms of the efficiency, accuracy, and robustness of the WRSG stator TTSC fault detection and isolation (FDI) over conventional methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".