MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410159169 · doi:10.5006/4737

Method of Fabricating Robust Microcapillary for Corrosion Testing

2025· article· en· W4410159169 on OpenAlexaff
Ankur Kumar, I-Wen Huang, Mary Lyn Lim, G. S. Frankel

Bibliographic record

VenueCORROSION · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Canadian institutionsNovelis (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrosionMaterials scienceCapillary actionMetallurgyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A straightforward method is introduced to fabricate microcapillary tips with a diameter of around 20 µm that are ideal for corrosion testing of small phases in multiphase alloys. The approach produces robust tips that are not susceptible to fracture, eliminates issues related to silicone skirts, and offers a high yield of fabrication. The functionality of a 20 µm diameter microcapillary is validated through potentiodynamic polarization experiments on 316L stainless steel, AA6016, β constituent phase (AlxFeySi) in 6xxx aluminum alloys, and the austenite and ferrite phases in 2205 duplex stainless steel. The results exhibit good repeatability and agree with literature data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCORROSIONSame topicSurface Modification and SuperhydrophobicityFrench-language works237,207