Radiation-Induced Synchronous Parathyroid Carcinoma and Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Clinical, Morphological, and Genetic Insights
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The clinicopathological and molecular features of synchronous parathyroid carcinoma (PC) and thyroid carcinoma in a male patient are presented. At 11, he received mantle field radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma. He had a 26-year adulthood history of recurrent nephrolithiasis treated five times with lithotripsy. At 52, he was referred to our clinic for hypercalcemia. Primary hyperparathyroidism was diagnosed (calcium: 3.46 mmol/L, parathormone: 150 pmol/L, preserved renal function, nephrolithiasis, and osteoporosis). Neck ultrasound revealed a 41 × 31 × 37 mm nodule in the left thyroid and smaller nodules in the right thyroid. Enlarged cervical lymph nodes were not observed. The large nodule was interpreted as parathyroid adenoma on 99Tc-pertechnetate scintigraphy/99Tc-MIBI scintigraphy with SPECT/CT. Total left-sided and subtotal right-sided thyroidectomy were performed. Histopathology confirmed locally invasive, low-grade PC (pT2; positive for parafibromin and E-cadherin, negative for galectin-3 and PGP9.5; wild-type expression for p53 and retinoblastoma protein; Ki-67 index 10%) and incidental papillary thyroid carcinoma (pT1b). Genetic profiling revealed no loss in CDC73, MEN1, CCND1, PIK3CA, CDH1, RB1, and TP53 genes. Deletions in CDKN2A, LATS1, ARID1A, ARID1B, RAD54L, and MUTYH genes and monosomies in nine chromosomes were identified. The tumor mutational burden and genomic instability score were low, and the tumor was microsatellite-stable. The thyroid carcinoma exhibited a TRIM24::BRAF fusion. Following surgery, the parathormone and calcium levels had normalized, and the patient underwent radioiodine treatment for thyroid cancer. The follow-up of 14 months was eventless. In summary, the clinical, laboratory, and imaging features of hyperparathyroidism taken together could have suggested malignancy, then confirmed histologically. The synchronous carcinomas were most likely caused by irradiation treatment diagnosed 41 years after exposure. It seems that the radiation injury initially induced parathyroid adenoma in young adulthood, which underwent a malignant transformation around age fifty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".