Evaluating Urban Heat Island Effects in Malang City Parks Using UAV and OBIA Technologies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Object-Based Image Analysis (OBIA) in classifying high-resolution satellite and drone imagery, and its application in mapping the distribution of Land Surface Temperature (LST) in Malang City parks.Malang was chosen because of its unique urban dynamics and the challenges faced in managing the urban heat island effect.Using data from thermal UAVs, this study provides a detailed analysis of urban microscale green spaces.OBIA is applied to classify areas based on surface material and vegetation, resulting in an accurate mapping of LST variations.The results show that areas with dense vegetation such as Merdeka Square Park have lower LST values, while areas with hard surfaces such as asphalt and concrete show higher LST values.This study reveals that 22.13% of the area has very low temperatures (31-36) and 30.05% with high temperatures (46-51).The implications of these results are very relevant for policy development, showing that increasing urban green space, planting wide canopy trees, using environmentally friendly materials, and adding water elements have a significant impact on reducing the urban heat island effect and increasing thermal comfort.These recommendations can be integrated into the urban planning strategy of Malang and other cities with similar characteristics to support the sustainability of the urban environment globally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it