MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410162642 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.200416

Alternative Strategies for the Development Vector of the Arabian Peninsula Countries

2025· article· en· W4410162642 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Almas Mukhametov, Е. Л. Морева, Madina Bayramli, Artem Smirnov, Igor Egorov

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEconomic Growth and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeninsulaVector (molecular biology)GeographyPolitical scienceEnvironmental planningRegional scienceArchaeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this research article is to develop and substantiate a SMART diversification strategy for the development of the Arabian Peninsula countries based on an analysis of their current national economic structure, global oil prices, and selected transformation strategies.The research methodology includes a quantitative analysis of time series from 1970 to 2023 for Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates, as well as a qualitative analysis of the correlation between oil prices and economic conditions.Within the framework of this study, new models and scientific approaches aimed at the sustainable development of nonresource sectors of the economy have been proposed, such as digital technologies, renewable energy, and tourism.Special attention is given to a comprehensive assessment of the impact of the proposed approaches on macroeconomic indicators and the economic resilience of the region, as well as on the adaptation of these models under conditions of global changes in capital and resource markets.To maintain political stability, it is essential to actively pursue a diversification policy focusing on increasing the share of renewable energy sources in the energy balance, enhancing food production, and advancing digital technologies and tourism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicEconomic Growth and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207