How Does the Health of Public Housing Residents Compare With the Rest of the Population? A Survey of OMHTR Residents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the physical health, mental health, health-related behaviors, life satisfaction, and health care utilization of Office municipal d'habitation de Trois-Rivières (OMHTR) public housing residents compared with those of residents of the Mauricie region in Quebec. We administered a reduced version of the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) to 150 OMHTR residents between July and November 2019, and compared the data with aggregated data from the 2018 CCHS for the Mauricie region using multivariable logistic regression. Results revealed significant disparities in health outcomes and service utilization patterns. OMHTR residents had higher odds of poor physical, oral, and mental health, along with dissatisfaction across various life domains. They also showed increased likelihood of seeking health care for mental health issues and reported injuries within the past year. These findings highlight considerable disparities in health outcomes and access to health care between OMHTR residents and their regional counterparts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".