Deep Learning-Based Urban Tree Species Mapping with High-Resolution Pléiades Imagery in Nanjing, China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In rapidly urbanizing regions, encroachment on native green spaces has exacerbated ecological issues such as urban heat islands and flooding. Accurate mapping of tree species distribution is therefore vital for sustainable urban management. However, the high heterogeneity of urban landscapes, resulting from the coexistence of diverse land covers, built infrastructure, and anthropogenic activities, often leads to reduced robustness and transferability of remote sensing classification methods across different images and regions. In this study, we used very high–resolution Pléiades imagery and field-verified samples of eight common urban trees and background land covers. By employing transfer learning with advanced segmentation networks, we evaluated each model’s accuracy, robustness, and efficiency. The best-performing network delivered markedly superior classification consistency and required substantially less training time than a model trained from scratch. These findings offer concise, practical guidance for selecting and deploying deep learning methods in urban tree species mapping, supporting improved ecological monitoring and planning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".