MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410174837 · doi:10.5117/9789463724333_ch01

Francis’s Disappearing Infirmities: Disability and the Expectations of Masculine Sanctity in the Thirteenth Century

2025· book-chapter· en· W4410174837 on OpenAlexaff
Donna Trembinski

Bibliographic record

VenueAmsterdam University Press eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay explores Bonaventure’s Legenda maior as a site of negotiation. Completed in 1266, the hagiography presents a Francis intended to unite the factions in his Order: those who wanted the Order to hold property and be led by educated clerics and those who believed that Francis’ vision of an Order dedicated to apostolic poverty was being compromised. In doing so, Bonaventure had to contend with the disparate views of these factions, which vacillated between seeing Francis an active founder and seeing him as a man dedicated to apostolic poverty who was ill for most of his converted life. The Legenda maior threads the needle between these views, by presenting an active, less infirm Francis who passively receives God’s direction and love.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmsterdam University Press eBooksSame topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207