MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410176457 · doi:10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100450

Impact of ozone nanobubble on water quality, gut microbiota, and growth performance of white leg shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) in an intensive indoor farming system

2025· article· en· W4410176457 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Nexus · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsPenaeusShrimpShrimp farmingFisheryAgricultureWater qualityBiologyBusinessAquacultureEcologyFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This study evaluated the effects of ozone nanobubbles (NB-O₃) on water quality, growth performance, survival rate, and gut microbiota in intensive indoor farming of white-leg shrimp ( Penaeus vannamei ). The experiment lasted 12 weeks and included two groups: (1) NB-O₃ treatment at 0.3 mg/L ozone concentration and (2) a control group without NB-O₃ treatment. Water quality parameters including temperature, dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, and Oxidation Reduction Potential (ORP) were monitored daily. Weekly analyses were conducted for Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Biochemical Oxygen Demand after 5 days (BOD₅), Ammonia Nitrogen (NH₃-N), Nitrite Nitrogen (NO₂-N), and Vibrio counts. Shrimp weight was recorded weekly, while final biomass (FB), final body weight (FBW), survival rate (SR), feed conversion ratio (FCR), specific growth rate (SGR), and mean weekly weight gain (MWWG) were evaluated at the end of study. Gut microbiota samples were collected on days 1, 60, and 84. The results showed that NB-O₃ significantly reduced COD, total Vibrio , and NH₃-N levels compared to the control (p<0.05). Shrimp in the NB-O₃ group exhibited significantly higher weights from week 5 onwards (p<0.05), with improved FB, FBW, SGR, and MWWG compared to the control (p<0.05). However, SR and FCR were lower in the NB-O₃ group (p<0.05). Dominant gut microbiota phyla in NB-O₃-treated shrimp were Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Acinobacteriota, with their proportions recorded as 72.27%, 13.82%, and 6.72% on day 1; 60.75%, 17.16%, and 18.64% on day 60; and 45.74%, 40.25%, and 8.44% on day 84, respectively. Significant differences in alpha and beta diversity were observed between groups on days 1 and 60 (p<0.05). Vibrio parahaemolyticus density was lower in NB-O₃-treated shrimp (p<0.05). These findings demonstrate that NB-O₃ improves water quality, enhances shrimp growth performance, and effectively regulates Vibrio spp. in intensive indoor farming systems. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report the effects of NB-O3 on shrimp gut microbiota.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.658
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it