MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

THE INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION

2022· article· en· W4410176842 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Notes Series Law · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCompetency Development and Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVocational educationAdministration (probate law)Public administrationPolitical sciencePedagogySociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This scientific article examines the international experience of public administration of professional education. Ukraine, focusing on international experience, strives to improve the state of vocational and technical education. To this end, it actively participates in cooperation with international governmental and non-governmental organizations within the framework of joint projects for the development of professional and technical education. As part of consultations with social partners and other stakeholders, many European countries have created economic and social councils, vocational and technical education councils, and employment councils. Some countries also have industrial or training councils at regional or local levels. It is noted that when studying the international experience of public administration of professional education, it should be noted that the countries of the European Union are united in their vector for the implementation of professional education based on the principles of the Bologna process, in compliance with the principles of the Copenhagen Convention. The governments of the USA, the countries of the European Union, and Canada prefer a dual form of professional training and professional retraining. In Germany, France, Great Britain, Italy, the Netherlands, Denmark, preference is given to the dual form of education. Vocational training teachers in these countries are divided into two categories: teachers of basic subjects and teachers of special subjects. When determining the professional qualifications of a teacher, preference is given not to the presence of a scienti fic degree and publications, but to professional experience and the level of professional qualifications. In addition, teaching staff must constantly improve the level of their professional knowledge, abilities and skills at work. It is also worth emphasizing the density of vocational and technical educational institutions and the specialization of specialist training depending on the features of the administrative-territorial division (land, province, municipality).  In France, the management of vocational and technical educational institutions is based on the principle of decentralization. In Denmark, there are so-called "production schools", where vocational education students have the opportunity to obtain selective additional professional knowledge, skills and abilities according to the selected list, even as a special ist. The experience of the Netherlands, where the Central Register of Professional Courses operates, is interesting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it