MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410184804 · doi:10.1002/wsb.1593

Wildlife crossing database platform: A transdisciplinary approach to developing a tool for landscape connectivity planning and public engagement

2025· article· en· W4410184804 on OpenAlexafffund
Robert Newell, Nina‐Marie Lister, Ann Dale, Sabrina Careri

Bibliographic record

VenueWildlife Society Bulletin · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityRoyal Roads University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWildlifeCitizen scienceGeographyEnvironmental resource managementLandscape planningPublic participationWildlife managementPublic engagementEnvironmental planningEcologyBiologyEnvironmental sciencePolitical sciencePublic relations

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Implementing wildlife crossings and restoring landscape connectivity are ecological, social, and economic imperatives. However, in North America, connectivity planning faces challenges associated with governance being fragmented into local jurisdictions and no single agency being solely responsible. Such challenges present a need for tools that can support coordinated actions among different jurisdictions, agencies, and organizations, and effectively promote the importance of landscape connectivity work to diverse audiences. The current study employs a transdisciplinary approach for developing the wildlife crossing database platform (WCDP), a tool for sharing information among practitioners and engaging the public in critical landscape connectivity issues and efforts. The research was conducted in 2 stages: (1) developing a beta version of the WCDP, and (2) engaging diverse practitioners in the field of landscape connectivity to discuss its utility and identify needs for further development. The WCDP was created using Drupal and JavaScript, and it allows users to access, explore, share, and communicate information on wildlife database crossings in North America. A research‐practitioner discussion was convened to discuss the beta version of the WCDP, as well as the key considerations and recommendations for its further development as an effective landscape connectivity planning tool. Data from the researcher‐practitioner discussion were thematically coded and analyzed to reveal 4 major themes with important implications for tool development: (1) differentiate access and functionality between users and the public groups; (2) ensure lessons and success stories are effectively shared; (3) understand the complications and challenges around communicating wildlife crossing information; and (4) recognize landscape connectivity features that do not consist of wildlife crossing infrastructure. Our research produced valuable insights on considerations, challenges, and needs for landscape connectivity work, interprofessional online collaboration, and further refinement of the platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWildlife Society BulletinSame topicWildlife-Road Interactions and ConservationFrench-language works237,207