MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410188034 · doi:10.2147/iprp.s515197

Impact of Pharmacist Interventions on Health Outcomes of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Middle East: A Systematic Review

2025· review· en· W4410188034 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hussain T. Bakhsh

Bibliographic record

VenueIntegrated Pharmacy Research and Practice · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsType 2 Diabetes MellitusMiddle EastMedicinePharmacistPsychological interventionDiabetes mellitusSystematic reviewFamily medicineMEDLINENursingPharmacyHistoryPolitical scienceEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the association between pharmacists' interventions and health outcomes of patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) in the Middle East. A comprehensive database search was conducted in July 2024 using the electronic databases of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus. The search strategy involved the following keywords: "Impact", "Effect", "Pharmacist", "Pharmacy services", "Pharmaceutical Care", "Intervention", "Type 2 diabetes mellitus", "diabetes", and "Middle East". Articles published in the English language between January 2010 and July 2024 related to the research question were included. The data extracted from the included papers were summarized using narrative data synthesis. Twelve articles were selected from 536 retrieved articles, with most studies conducted in hospitals (n = 10) and randomized clinical trials (n = 8). The quality of studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-randomized studies to ensure transparent evaluation of the study quality. Narrative synthesis was employed to address variations in study design, outcomes, and biases. Pharmacist interventions reported included patient education (n = 11), counseling (n = 5), drug therapy initiation (n = 5), and dosage adjustment (n = 5). Studies reported significant reductions in glycosylated (HbA1c) (range: 1.4-1.78%) and fasting blood glucose levels (FBG) (range: 2.3-53 mg/dL), decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressure (range: 4.65-14.9 mmHg), body mass index (BMI) (range: 1-2.44 kg/m2), cholesterol, triglycerides, and total cholesterol, and improved medication adherence, self-care activities, and knowledge of diabetes management. In this review, pharmacist interventions reported were associated with improved clinical and humanistic outcomes among type 2 DM patients in the Middle-East. Therefore, collaborative care models involving pharmacists and other healthcare practitioners in the management of type 2 DM should be considered by health policymakers in the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.122
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.571
GPT teacher head0.614
Teacher spread0.042 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntegrated Pharmacy Research and PracticeSame topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesFrench-language works237,207