MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410188516 · doi:10.1177/1753495x251338746

Acute fatty liver in pregnancy presenting in the second trimester: A systematic literature review

2025· review· en· W4410188516 on OpenAlexaff
Laurence Bourque, Michèle Mahone

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetric Medicine · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcute fatty liver of pregnancyMedicinePregnancyEncephalopathyObstetricsLiver biopsyHELLP syndromeFetusGestationBiopsyPediatricsAsphyxiaInternal medicineEclampsia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: We present clinical features and outcomes of second-trimester acute fatty liver of pregnancy (AFLP), a serious but rare condition. Results: Fourteen pregnant women with AFLP or compatible biopsy were identified in the literature. Diagnosis occurred between 20 and 27 + 6 weeks of gestational age. In total, 50% were primigravid. Thirteen cases met the Swansea criteria while the other case had a compatible liver biopsy. In total, 10 out of 11 cases had microvesicular steatosis on their liver biopsy. Common maternal complications included acute renal failure, hypoglycaemia, liver failure, encephalopathy, intensive care unit admission and need for blood transfusions. Seven deliveries were on the day of diagnosis, five within four weeks, and two within three months. One maternal death, seven fetal deaths and three neonatal deaths occurred. Conclusion: AFLP diagnosed in the second trimester is a rare condition. Neonatal mortality and maternal morbidity are high. Most cases had nonspecific symptoms and clinical findings, but a majority had compatible biopsies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetric MedicineSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207