MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410192906 · doi:10.70359/bhc2012v037p061

Chemistry as a tool for historical research: Estimating the contraband of silver from Potosi and Oruro, 1576-1650

2012· article· en· W4410192906 on OpenAlexaff
Saúl Guerrero

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin for the history of chemistry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper tested two approaches to detect and quantify contraband of silver during the period 1576-1650 coming out of the two main silver prodn. centers of this period in the Vice-Royalty of Peru, Potosi and Oruro. First, the variations of the mercury to silver wt. ratio were analyzed on the basis it is a factor detd. by the stoichiometry of the redn. of silver chloride to elemental silver and the prodn. of calomel from mercury, together with the extent of phys. losses of mercury during amalgamation. The second approach involves the estn. of the nominal prodn. capacity for a refining center, and therefore has the advantage that it does not rely on any set of prodn. data, either of mercury or of silver.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score1.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin for the history of chemistrySame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207