MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410194013 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2024-0144

In situ mica Rb–Sr geochronology and microstructural analysis to evaluate the timing and sense of shear zone movement: Shannon and d'Abbadie Faults, Yukon, Canada

2025· article· en· W4410194013 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Kyle T. Tollefson, Kyle P. Larson, David P. Moynihan, Nathan Cleven

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaYukon UniversityOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeochronologyGeologyMicaShear zoneGeochemistrySeismologyPaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the microstructural and geochronological record in specimens collected along transects away from the Shannon fault and d'Abbadie fault, in the northern Canadian Cordillera. Microstructural analysis for both shear zones indicate dextral shear and an increase in paleostress and inferred strain magnitude toward each fault. In situ mica Rb–Sr geochronology from across a strain gradient developed by a single phase of deformation within the Shannon pluton, adjacent to the Shannon fault, dominantly records syn-emplacement deformation and/or rapid cooling at ca. 100 Ma with sparse analyses ranging to as young as ca. 63 Ma. U–Pb geochronology in apatite from the same specimens returns three ca. 100 Ma dates and two ca. 85 Ma dates. In contrast, lithologically heterogenous specimens that have experienced multiple deformational events, collected in proximity to the d'Abbadie fault, exhibit more variation in Rb–Sr dates, ranging from presumed regional cooling at ca. 195 Ma, a possible thermo-tectonic event at ca. 150 Ma, syn-pluton emplacement deformation and/or rapid cooling at ca. 100 Ma, and local partial resetting of Rb–Sr in mica most likely by brittle fault movement at ca. 80 Ma. U–Pb in apatite geochronology in the same specimens also records the ca. 100 Ma event. The results of this study demonstrate that lithological differences and multi-phase deformational histories create complexity in patterns of in situ Rb–Sr geochronology, and require interpretation within thermal and structural contexts, to quantify the timing of deformation in ductile high-strain shear zones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences→Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→