MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410196577 · doi:10.70803/001c.137893

Geometry Effects on the Fire Resistance Rating of Masonry

2020· article· en· W4410196577 on OpenAlexaff
Hamish Pope, Ehab Zalok

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Masonry Society Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire effects on concrete materials
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMasonryFire resistanceStructural engineeringGeometryGeologyResistance (ecology)Materials scienceGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringForensic engineeringComposite materialMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Masonry blocks are known to be good for thermal insulation. When exposed to the high temperatures of a fire, hollow blocks can still have a significantly long resistance to heat. The effects of conduction, convection, and radiation through hollow blocks have been studied at ambient temperatures to improve the thermal insulation; however, at elevated temperatures the heat transfer methods are not as well studied. Some experiments and models have been created to determine the horizontal heat flow through a block wall at elevated temperatures, and methods to reduce heat flow have been researched. The limitations of these studies are that they do not account for the vertical heat flow inside the cells of the blocks. When a hollow masonry wall is exposed to fire, the top of the wall is hotter than the bottom of the wall due to convection heat transfer. Since most experimental work, in the literature, deals with a single block or small masonry prisms, this vertical heat flow is difficult to study. This paper describes the heat transfer methods in hollow concrete masonry walls and gives an explanation of standardized fire testing. The equivalent thickness method for determining masonry fire resistance is discussed, and its limitations are outlined. The paper focuses on the experimental results of a full-scale test designed to determine the effects of adding a bond beam within a masonry wall, as well as the effects of using reduced web masonry blocks. Heat transfer methods through hollow masonry walls and methods to improve thermal resistance are also discussed. It was found that compartmentalization of hollow masonry blocks and hollow masonry walls played an important role in changing the fire resistance. The compartmentalization reduced the heat transfer via convection and radiation, and allowed for a more uniform temperature distribution. Since hollow masonry blocks are not themselves homogeneous, the surface temperature of the block is different at difference locations. The mortar, the solid web and the hollow cell all transfer heat at a different rate, which causes the surface of the masonry wall to have a non-uniform temperature distribution. It was found that at fire temperatures, heat transferred faster through the hollow cells, which is why finding methods to reduce the temperature in the hollow cells is important for improving the fire resistance of masonry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Masonry Society JournalSame topicFire effects on concrete materialsFrench-language works237,207