MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410202832 · doi:10.7202/1117876ar

Le risque de paternalisme dans le recours à l’éthique narrative : le cas de la stérilisation volontaire chez les femmes sans enfant de moins de 30 ans

2025· article· fr· W4410202832 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Arthur Filleul

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Bioethics · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Medicine and Society
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Clinical Research InstituteCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesMedicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce texte est un commentaire en réaction à l’article de Masella et Marceau, portant sur la stérilisation volontaire chez les femmes sans enfant de moins de 30 ans. Je soutiens que leur publication est essentielle pour permettre une analyse rigoureuse du dilemme éthique entre autonomie des femmes et paternalisme médical. Cependant, je suggère aussi que leur proposition d’une approche d’éthique narrative comme solution au dilemme éthique ouvre la voie à un paternalisme plus insidieux, mais tout aussi problématique. C’est-à-dire qu’une éthique narrative peut, paradoxalement, réactiver des dynamiques paternalistes et amplifier des injustices épistémiques et sociales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0030.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BioethicsSame topicHealth, Medicine and SocietyFrench-language works237,207