MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410204496 · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000850

Feasibility of HABIT-ILE@home in children with cerebral palsy and adults with chronic stroke: A pilot study

2025· article· en· W4410204496 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePLOS Digital Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersService Public de Wallonie
KeywordsCerebral palsyHabitMedicineNeurorehabilitationPhysical therapyOccupational therapyStroke (engine)RehabilitationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychologyPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Children with cerebral palsy (CP) and adults with chronic stroke (CS) usually have disabilities in voluntary motor control. Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy Including Lower Extremities (HABIT-ILE), an evidence-based therapy, has always been provided during day camps. This pilot study investigates if HABIT-ILE@home, a remote neurorehabilitation, is feasible for children with CP and adults with CS. METHODS: Four children with CP (5-18y) and three adults with CS were recruited. They received 15h (5x3h) of HABIT-ILE@home provided by a caregiver with a remote supervision of 30min at the beginning and end of each session. A large touch screen, the REAtouch Lite, was used as a support for the therapy. An interview based on a questionnaire (n = 73 items for CP/ n = 74 items for stroke patients; scored from 0 "disagree" to 3 "agree", a higher rating meaning a more positive aspect of the therapy) was conducted with patients and their caregivers after 15h of supervised home-therapy to assess their adherence to the treatment and the feasibility of HABIT-ILE@home. Performance and satisfaction in achieving functional goals were assessed before and after the intervention using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). RESULTS: Caregivers felt sufficiently supported by the supervision team (medians = 3) to carry out HABIT-ILE@home sessions thanks to an adequate clinical supervision (CP median = 2.6; CS median = 2.9). HABIT-ILE principles were transferable at patients' home (CP median = 2.6; CS median = 2.8). The impact of the therapy on daily organization was more problematic for children's caregivers (median = 1.5) than for adults' caregivers (median = 3). Children with CP enjoyed the therapy (median = 2) but felt that it was too long (median = 1) and significant fatigue was present (median = 1.3). CS adults did not find the therapy fun (median = 1) but considered it as extremely useful (median = 3). Although the motivational source differed between children and adults, this did not seem to strongly affect adherence to treatment. Performance and satisfaction in achieving functional goals improved over the MCID (2 points) for all CS participants and for 3 out 4 CP children. CONCLUSION: HABIT-ILE@home seems to be feasible for children with CP and adults with CS. It may allow more patients to benefit from an efficient neurorehabilitation, whatever sanitary conditions or patients' home geographical locations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it