MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410205599 · doi:10.5840/symposium20252919

La métaphore de la « courbure de l’espace »

2025· article· en· W4410205599 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cosimo Nicolini Coen

Bibliographic record

VenueSymposium · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Beginning with Levinas’s metaphor of the curvature of space found in Totality and Infinity and following with passages in Otherwise Than Being, this article argues for the asymmetry of ethical obligation as the constitutive event of our experience of spatiality. At the same time, I will point out, the juridical obligation appears as a form of delimitation pivotal to the shaping of geometrical spatiality—i.e., of ontological symmetry. Subsequently, I propose to deepen the status of law through its metaphorical representation as a city or a refuge: a place to build the justice of the institutions, but where one may be tempted to find refuge from ethical exposition. Finally, by tackling the task of keeping open a passage between the dit and the dire, I shall inquire into the possibility—including by referring to Jewish hermeneutics—of a liminal experience that may prevent the limit of the law from closing in on itself, degenerating into totality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSymposiumSame topicPhilosophy, Ethics, and ExistentialismFrench-language works237,207