Pengaruh Kepemimpinan, Kompetensi dan Disiplin Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Dinas Pertanian dan Perkebunan Kabupaten Bireuen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The research aims to test hypotheses about the influence of leadership, competence and work discipline, partially and simultaneously on employee performance. The study was conducted at the Bireuen Regency Agriculture and Plantation Service. Data collection took the form of a survey through a questionnaire that was prepared and tested for validity and reliability. Carried out using an associative descriptive method with a path analysis approach. The research results prove that (1) there is a significant influence of leadership on the performance of Bireuen Regency Agriculture and Plantation Service employees, namely 43.01%. The influence of competence is 47.91% and the influence of work discipline is 43.41%. (2) Simultaneously, leadership, competence and work discipline contribute to increased performance by 46,5%. (3) There is a causal relationship between leadership and employee competency of 34.8%. The relationship between competency and employee work discipline is 48.3% and the relationship between work discipline and leadership is 41.4%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".