Pengaruh Kepemimpinan, Kompetensi dan Disiplin Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Dinas Pertanian dan Perkebunan Kabupaten Bireuen
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The research aims to test hypotheses about the influence of leadership, competence and work discipline, partially and simultaneously on employee performance. The study was conducted at the Bireuen Regency Agriculture and Plantation Service. Data collection took the form of a survey through a questionnaire that was prepared and tested for validity and reliability. Carried out using an associative descriptive method with a path analysis approach. The research results prove that (1) there is a significant influence of leadership on the performance of Bireuen Regency Agriculture and Plantation Service employees, namely 43.01%. The influence of competence is 47.91% and the influence of work discipline is 43.41%. (2) Simultaneously, leadership, competence and work discipline contribute to increased performance by 46,5%. (3) There is a causal relationship between leadership and employee competency of 34.8%. The relationship between competency and employee work discipline is 48.3% and the relationship between work discipline and leadership is 41.4%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it