MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410216546 · doi:10.55041/isjem03425

Dog Breed Prediction Using Deep Learning

2025· article· en· W4410216546 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shyam Sai Krishna Battula

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Scientific Journal of Engineering and Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreedArtificial intelligenceDeep learningComputer scienceBiologyAnimal science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The increasing popularity of pet ownership has led to a growing interest in methods for accurately identifying dog breeds. This interest is not only driven by the desire of pet owners to understand their pets better but also by the implications for veterinary care, breeding practices, and animal welfare. Traditional methods of breed identification often rely on expert knowledge, which can be inconsistent and subjective. In contrast, advancements in deep learning, particularly through Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), offer a promising solution to automate and enhance the accuracy of breed classification. Deep learning is a subset of machine learning that utilizes neural networks with multiple layers to analyze complex data. CNNs, specifically designed for processing grid-like data such as images, have shown exceptional performance in various image classification tasks. Their architecture allows them to learn spatial hierarchies of features, making them particularly adept at recognizing patterns in visual data. The ability of CNNs to automatically extract relevant features from images eliminates the need for manual feature engineering, significantly streamlining the classification process. The Kaggle Dog Breed Dataset serves as an ideal resource for training deep learning models aimed at dog breed classification. This dataset comprises thousands of labeled images of dogs belonging to various breeds, providing a rich foundation for model training and evaluation. For this study, we focus on a subset of four dog breeds to simplify the classification task while still allowing for meaningful analysis. The selected breeds include Labrador Retriever, German Shepherd, Golden Retriever, and French Bulldog—each with distinct physical characteristics that can be visually identified. Data preprocessing is a critical step in preparing the dataset for training. This involves resizing images, normalizing pixel values, and applying data augmentation techniques to enhance the diversity of the training set. Data augmentation methods, such as rotation, flipping, and scaling, help to artificially increase the dataset size and improve the model’s ability to generalize to unseen images. By creating variations of existing images, the model learns to recognize the core features of each breed, regardless of changes in orientation, lighting, or background. The architecture of the CNN employed in this study is designed to maximize classification accu- racy. It consists of multiple convolutional layers, each followed by activation functions and pooling layers to reduce dimensionality and retain important features. Dropout layers are also incorporated to prevent overfitting by randomly setting a fraction of input units to zero during training, thus promoting the model’s ability to generalize. The final layers of the network include fully connected layers that output the probabilities of each breed classification, allowing for effective decision-making based on learned features. Training the model involves feeding it the preprocessed images and their corresponding labels. The model’s performance is monitored using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. These metrics provide a comprehensive understanding of the model’s classification capabilities, par- ticularly in distinguishing between the selected dog breeds. Cross-validation techniques are employed to ensure that the model is not only effective on the training set but also capable of performing well on unseen data. The results of the study demonstrate the efficacy of deep learning methods in accurately pre- dicting dog breeds. The CNN model achieves a high classification accuracy, showcasing its ability to learn and generalize from the training data. Furthermore, the model’s performance is compared against existing traditional methods, highlighting the advantages of using deep learning for image classification tasks. The findings indicate that the deep learning approach significantly outperforms conventional techniques, providing a reliable solution for dog breed identification. Interpretability is a crucial aspect of AI applications, especially in domains such as veterinary sci- ence where understanding the decision-making process is vital. To enhance the interpretability of the model’s predictions, techniques such as Grad-CAM (Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping) are utilized. Grad-CAM generates heatmaps that highlight the regions of an image most influential in the model’s decision-making process. This provides valuable insights into which features the model considers important for classifying specific breeds, thereby fostering trust and transparency in AI systems. The implications of this research extend beyond academic interest; they hold practical signifi- cance for pet owners, breeders, and veterinary professionals. An accurate dog breed classification system can assist veterinarians in diagnosing breed-specific health issues, guide breeders in making informed decisions, and help pet owners understand their dogs’ behavior and care needs. Addition- ally, the automated nature of the deep learning model can facilitate quicker and more consistent breed identification, enhancing user experience and satisfaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Scientific Journal of Engineering and ManagementSame topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207