MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410216721 · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf203

SVHunter: long-read-based structural variation detection through the transformer model

2025· article· en· W4410216721 on OpenAlexaff
Runtian Gao, Heng Hu, Zhongjun Jiang, Shuqi Cao, Guohua Wang, Yuming Zhao, Tao Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueBriefings in Bioinformatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsScience North
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Fund for Distinguished Young ScholarsNational Science Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceCluster analysisRobustness (evolution)Convolutional neural networkData miningArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)TransformerMachine learningBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Structural variations (SVs) are genomic rearrangements larger than 50 bp, that are widely present in the human genome and are associated with various complex diseases. Existing long-read-based SV detection tools often rely on fixed rules or heuristic algorithms, which can oversimplify the complexity of SV signatures. Therefore, these methods usually lack flexibility and cannot fully capture SV signals, leading to reduced accuracy and robustness. To address these issues, we propose SVHunter, a transformer-based method for long-read SV detection. SVHunter combines convolutional neural networks and transformers to capture both local and global SV signatures, enabling accurate identification of SVs. Additionally, SVHunter employs the mean shift clustering algorithm, which dynamically adjusts bandwidth parameters to accommodate different types of SVs without requiring a preset number of clusters, thus allowing precise breakpoint clustering. Validation across multiple sequencing platforms and datasets demonstrates that SVHunter excels at detecting various types of SVs, with a notable reduction in the false discovery rate. This highlights considerable strong potential for both research and clinical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBriefings in BioinformaticsSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207