MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410224705 · doi:10.1186/s12995-026-00510-y

Systematic Review of Health Challenges Experienced by Indian Women Engaged in Informal Labor

2025· preprint· en· W4410224705 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLabour economicsPolitical scienceBusinessPsychologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Informal economy encompasses all economic activities carried out by workers or economic units that are, not adequately covered by formal legal or regulatory frameworks. National data from India hints 53.7% of the 308 million unorganized workers are women. In view of the multifaceted occupational risk, informal women workers are at risk of multiple health challenges. Present study aims to synthesize existing evidence on the health challenges experienced by Indian women in informal labor.Methods: Studies reporting health challenges experienced by Indian women engaged in informal labor were systematically searched from digital databases available until September 09, 2024. Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were adhered during the execution. In view of heterogeneous reporting of results and non-availability of data dispersion, pooled effect size could not be estimated. Risk of biases among the included studies were assessed using Newcastle Ottawa Scale.Results: Thirty-three studies involving informal women were included. Musculoskeletal discomfort was most prevalent among all forms of informal women workers. Prevalence of upper limb and trunk discomfort (89 – 95%) was higher than the lower trunk / limbs (61-81%). Prevalence of cardio-respiratory (~73%), dermatological (32 – 78%) and ophthalmic (45 – 90%) related symptoms were notably high. Few studies highlighted the odds of some of these health challenges were higher among women as compared to men. Majority of the included studies carried high risk of bias in all assessed domains.Conclusion: Current observations highlight the significant health challenges faced by Indian informal women laborers. Despite the results being derived by sub-quality primary studies, given the growing female participation in India’s informal economy, this evidence calls for urgent and inclusive action. There is a pressing need to integrate informal women workers into primary health and social protection programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.724

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it