MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410226577 · doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000398

The Virtual Water Gallery: Art as a catalyst for transforming knowledge and behaviour in water and climate

2025· article· en· W4410226577 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Louise Arnal, Corinne J. Schuster‐Wallace

Bibliographic record

VenuePLOS Climate · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Education and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council
KeywordsVirtual waterClimate changeBusinessEnvironmental scienceGeographyWater scarcityGeologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water is essential for life. Water-related challenges, such as droughts, floods, water quality degradation, permafrost thaw and glacier melt, exacerbated by climate change, affect everyone. It is challenging, yet of critical importance, to communicate science on such difficult highly volatile topics. Art is a more approachable medium to traditional scientific outlets, with the potential to diversify voices at the table and to lead to more wholistic solutions to these complex challenges. Launched in 2020, the Virtual Water Gallery is a transdisciplinary science and art project of the Global Water Futures program, that aims to provide a collaborative space for dialogues between water experts, artists, and the wider public, to explore water challenges we all face. As part of this initiative, a diverse group of 14 artists or sci-artists from across Canada were paired with teams of Global Water Futures scientists to co-explore specific water challenges in various Canadian ecoregions and communities. These collaborations led to the co-creation of artworks exhibited online on the Virtual Water Gallery in 2021. In 2022, the Virtual Water Gallery came to life with an in-person exhibit in Canmore, Alberta, Canada. Surveys were developed to capture changes in knowledge, attitudes and water-related climate mitigation practices of visitors to this science and art online and in-person exhibit. Surveys were also developed to capture experiences of the project participants. Results from the survey responses of 139 visitors hint to the significance of art in changing knowledge levels and intended behaviours related to water-related climate change mitigation, especially for visitors with low prior knowledge levels. This underscores the potential of science and art to extend beyond communication, acting as a catalyst in the collaborative creation of new knowledge for the benefit of society. The insights gained from project participant responses can serve as valuable guidance for shaping future initiatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.020
Scholarly communication0.0170.008
Open science0.0020.017
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLOS ClimateSame topicEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207