MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Compression and Transmission of 8K Stereoscopic VR Using VAE-GAN Latents and Standard Encoders

2025· article· en· W4410227464 on OpenAlexaff
Hatem Abou-Zeid, Diwakar Krishnamurthy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTelecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncoderComputer scienceStereoscopyTransmission (telecommunications)Data compressionComputer graphics (images)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the heightened popularity of Virtual Re-ality (VR), streaming high-resolution stereoscopic VR remains a challenge. This is primarily due to significant bandwidth demands of high-definition VR content. While advanced deep neural networks (DNN s) have demonstrated the potential to outperform standard codecs, their integration into real-world transmission frameworks is complex and not directly compatible with current encoding standards. To bridge this gap, this paper proposes a novel technique for compressing and transmitting 8K stereoscopic scenes using Variational Autoencoder (VAE) GAN latents represented as 3-channel RGB scenes that can be transmitted via standard encoders. The proposed method reduces bandwidth requirements by 45.1 % across different 8K scenes while maintaining visual quality, highlighting the effectiveness of the approach. This study also investigates the impact of varying patch-sizes of input frames for model training and evaluate its influence on client-side reconstructions. We then explore various transmission configurations of latent frames. Our findings suggest that while residual transmission offers limited benefits for 3-channel latent frame compression, raw transmission consistently yields better results, particularly for texture-heavy scenes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first such transmission study on 8K stereoscopic scenes for cloud-based VR, providing valuable insights for optimizing high-resolution VR streaming systems. Code: github.com/sampreetucalgary07/8K-VR-compression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTelecommunications and Broadcasting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207