Energy Consumption Reduction for UAV Trajectory Training: A Transfer Learning Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The advent of 6G technology demands flexible, scalable wireless architectures to support ultra-low latency, high connectivity, and high device density. The Open Radio Access Network (O-RAN) framework, with its open interfaces and virtualized functions, provides a promising foundation for such architectures. However, traditional fixed base stations alone are not sufficient to fully capitalize on the benefits of O-RAN due to their limited flexibility in responding to dynamic network demands. The integration of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) as mobile RUs within the O-RAN architecture offers a solution by leveraging the flexibility of drones to dynamically extend coverage. However, UAV operating in diverse environments requires frequent retraining, leading to significant energy waste. We proposed transfer learning based on Dueling Double Deep Q network (DDQN) with multi-step learning, which significantly reduces the training time and energy consumption required UAVs to adapt to new environments. We designed simulation environments and conducted ray tracing experiments using Wireless InSite with real-world map data. In the two simulated environments, training energy consumption was reduced by 30.52% and 58.51%, respectively. Furthermore, tests on real-world maps of Ottawa and Rosslyn showed energy reductions of 44.85% and 36.97%, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".