MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410240629 · doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c18568

Gelation Dynamics, Formation Mechanism, Functionalization, and 3D Bioprinting of Silk Fibroin Hydrogel Materials for Biomedical Applications

2025· review· en· W4410240629 on OpenAlexaff
Linpeng Fan, Zengxiao Cai, Jian Zhao, Negar Mahmoudi, Yi Wang, Samuel Cheeseman, Lilith M. Caballero Aguilar, Rui L. Reis, Subhas C. Kundu, David L. Kaplan, David R. Nisbet, Jingliang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Nano · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilk-based biomaterials and applications
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Centre
FundersArmy Research OfficeNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringAustralian Research Council
KeywordsFibroinSurface modificationMaterials scienceNanotechnologyBiomimetic materials3D bioprintingSelf-healing hydrogelsMechanism (biology)SILKPolymer scienceTissue engineeringChemical engineeringComposite materialPolymer chemistryBiomedical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

), is a natural protein polymer known for its biocompatibility, biodegradability, and sustainability. The protein can be processed into various material formats suitable for a range of applications. Among these, SF hydrogels are useful in the biomedical field, such as tissue engineering, due to the tailorable structures and properties achievable through tuning the gelation process. Therefore, the focus of this contribution is to comprehensively review and understand the formation, gelation mechanism, dynamic control, and functionalization of SF hydrogels. Unlike previous reviews, this work delves into understanding the strategies and mechanisms for tuning the gelation dynamics of SF from molecular assembly and crystallization points of view. Further, this review presents functionalization pathways and practical examples, such as for the 3D printing of SF hydrogels, to illustrate how these strategies, mechanisms, and pathways can be implemented in a specific application scenario. With these insights, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of how to manipulate or control the gelation process and the types of functionalization to achieve specific properties and features. This knowledge would further facilitate the development and application of SF hydrogel materials in various fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS NanoSame topicSilk-based biomaterials and applicationsFrench-language works237,207