MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410242633 · doi:10.5430/ijba.v16n2p18

A New Approach to Measure the Transmission Mechanism of Monetary Policy in the Intrinsic Value of Banks

2025· article· en· W4410242633 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marcelo De Oliveira Passos, João Basílio Pereima Neto, Raul Cunha, Mathias Schneid Tessmann, Alexandre Vasconcelos Lima

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Business Administration · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMonetary Policy and Economic Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeasure (data warehouse)Intrinsic value (animal ethics)Mechanism (biology)Value (mathematics)Monetary policyMonetary transmission mechanismTransmission (telecommunications)EconomicsMonetary economicsComputer scienceCredit channelTelecommunicationsPhysicsInflation targetingPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the transmission channels of monetary policy in the economy. Therefore, an economic and financial simulation model was developed based on the five main valuation models to estimate the intrinsic value of the five largest Brazilian banks as basic interest rates vary. This approach, in short, attempts to complement the traditional analysis of the transmission mechanism through the asset price channel by considering the intrinsic value channel of assets. The results show that the impact of these changes on the banking sector does not tend to affect its intrinsic values negatively. In fact, in most situations, banks increase their intrinsic value with lower base interest rates and lose very little intrinsic value when those rates rise. These findings demystify the notion that the main Brazilian banks prefer a macroeconomic environment with high basic interest rates and are useful to policymakers, investors, and other economic agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.613
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Business AdministrationSame topicMonetary Policy and Economic ImpactFrench-language works237,207