MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410246134 · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2025.05.022

Imaging the microstructure of the arterial wall – ex vivo to in vivo potential

2025· review· en· W4410246134 on OpenAlexaff
Brooke Tornifoglio, Celia Hughes, Robert D. Johnston, Caitríona Lally

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Biomaterialia · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilEuropean Research CouncilHorizon 2020 Framework Programme
KeywordsEx vivoMaterials scienceMicrostructureIn vivoBiomedical engineeringComposite materialMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microstructural imaging enables researchers to visualise changes in the arterial wall, allowing for (i) a deeper understanding of the role of specific components in arterial mechanics, (ii) the observation of cellular responses, (iii) insights into pathological alterations in tissue microstructure, and/or (iv) advancements in tissue engineering aimed at replicating healthy native tissue. In this prospective review, we present various imaging modalities spanning from ex vivo to in vivo applications within arterial tissue. The pros, cons, and sensitivities of these modalities are highlighted. By consolidating the latest advancements in microstructural imaging of arterial tissue, the authors aim for this paper to serve as a guide for researchers designing experiments at various stages. Furthermore, the integration of non-invasive, non-destructive imaging techniques into studies provides an additional layer of microstructural information, enhancing scientific findings, improving our understanding of disease, and potentially enabling earlier or more effective diagnostic capabilities. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Imaging the specific microstructural components of the arterial wall provides critical insights into vascular biology, mechanics, and pathology. It enables the visualisation of key structural components and their roles in arterial function, supports the analysis of cell-matrix interactions, and reveals microarchitectural changes associated with disease progression. This level of specificity also informs the design of biomimetic materials and scaffolds in tissue engineering, facilitating the replication of native arterial properties. By synthesising recent developments in microstructural imaging techniques, this paper serves as a reference for investigators designing experiments across a range of vascular research applications. Moreover, the incorporation of non-invasive, non-destructive imaging methods offers a means to acquire detailed microstructural data without compromising tissue integrity. This enhances the interpretability and translational potential of findings, deepens our understanding of vascular disease mechanisms, and may ultimately contribute to the development of earlier and more precise diagnostic approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.562
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa BiomaterialiaSame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207