Efforts to Improve Children's Fine Motor Skills through Sewing Activities at Raudhatul Athfal 'Aisyiyah Gontor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Children, especially early childhood, are the most optimal period for development. For children, motor development greatly influences other aspects of development. Therefore, researchers took steps to improve children's fine motor skills through sewing activities. The purpose of this improvement is to improve children's fine motor skills through sewing activities in group B at RA 'Aisyiyah Gontor Mlarak Ponorogo in the 2022/2023 academic year. This research was conducted at Raudhatul Athfal 'Aisyiyah Gontor in the 2022/2023 academic year with 20 students. The implementation of this research used 2 cycles. Each cycle 5 RPPH (5 meetings). In cycle II, the aspects assessed experienced an increase. Through sewing activities, the results obtained increased in children's sewing abilities, namely in cycle I, children who had one star were 20%, children who had two stars 65%, children who had three stars 15%, children who had four stars 0%. In cycle II, children who have one star are 0%, children who have two stars are 15%, children who have three stars are 70%, children who have four stars are 15%. Thus, this research experienced an increase in cycle II.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it