Editorial: Community series in intravital microscopy imaging of leukocytes, volume II
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The field of intravital microscopy (IVM) has come a long way since the method was established as we know it. The first humble attempts from the 19 th century, with application of very basic light microscopes, allowed for initial observations of leukocytes in transparent tissues. In fact, these observations resulted in correct and clinically relevant description of a phenomenon known currently as diapedesis: "an emerging of colourless blood corpuscles from the interior of a vein to the outside, completely through the intact wall" (1) albeit the process itself was an enigma at the time. As of late 1970s, the method was revived (2) and gradually improved surgically and microscopically, especially upon the advent of confocal and multiphoton scopes which enabled for detection of fluorescent markers (antibodies, dyes or proteins).The current volume of the Research Topic was proceed by volume I published in years 2019-2020 (3,4,13,(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) and is summarized herein (14). The first volume focused on the latest methodological advancements in the field of IVM as well as some novel findings both in terms of unstudied diseases, and leukocyte function and cellular fate. In the current volume the papers continued reporting on the latest developments in the field as well as clinically relevant discoveries accomplished with the past 5 years.The review paper by Suthya et al. published in our Research Topic, starts by reminding us of the humble beginnings of IVM mentioned above but then updates the reader on the newest hardware, with a particular focus on imaging the brain (15). The types of microscopes discussed ranged from confocal microscopes through single-and multiphoton devices, leading to photoacoustic imaging (PAI). When it comes to imaging dynamic processes, spinning-disk confocal scopes, or their more contemporary alternates such as resonant-scanning confocal scopes possibly combined with multiphoton imaging, are preferred. The review also discusses the tissue penetration depth that can be achieved with each imaging technology, whilst providing the newest information on labelling tools required for IVM imaging of any organ, and emerging reporter animal models (15). One of the technical struggles with traditional fluorescent microscopes is the limited number of fluorescent channels, however this has been overcome with spectral scopes (i.e. the above mentioned resonant-scanning platforms) which are capable of detecting any signals in any spectrum, solve the problem. In light of this, there will be an emerging expansion of fluorophores than those exisiting as technically any wavelength along the spectrum can be detected by these new microscopes. However, they are not accessible to all in the field and Suthya et al. describe how application of some of the newest generations of detectable molecules i.e. quantum dots of nano-crystals/particles, can enable more flexibility even when scope technology is limited. The work-around is further emphasized by Porto-Pedrosa et al., which is introduced in the subsequent paragraphs, underlining the key aspects of new fluorochromes, and in particular demonstrates usefulness of Brilliant Violet and other new generations of polymers (16).One of the most extensively investigated leukocytes by IVM are neutrophils. Neutrophils are first responders to the inflammatory insult and can eliminate pathogens by multiple approaches, many of which are linked to their ability to release an array of mediators (some 1300 unique proteins) carried in their numerous granules (17). Pathogen elimination by neutrophils may occur either intracellularly following phagocytosis or extracellularly upon granule release (degranulation) or formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) (18,19). Yam et al. focus their review on recent advancements of imaging neutrophils in the context of cancer. When it comes to methodology, the review focuses on appropriate antibodies (e.g. Gr-1 versus Ly6G) and reporter mice that recently revolutionized the IVM field (20). Also, the review by Suthya et al. underlines the importance of the latter model in brain studies, as staining with antibodies when neutrophils halt blood flow prevents antibody access to these cells thereby limiting labelling, and furthermore, prolonged exposure to anti-Ly6G antibodies can eventually lead to neutrophil depletion. These issues are completely solved when using Catchup IVM mice, animals expressing genetically-encoded fluorescent reporter molecules within neutrophils (15,20). An exciting part of the Yam et al. paper highlights the use of IVM in revealing the contribution of neutrophil in cancer development/metastasis. Here, neutrophils were shown to support transformed cell development, and limit their motility (lower velocity) when inside the tumor microenvironment presumably to interact with cancer cells. Furthermore, NETs can trap circulating tumor cells in hepatic sinusoids, and modulate to the metastatic process (20). Previously NETs were also show to awaken dormant cancer cells (21).Intravital imaging of the beating heart is one of the most challenging and recent advances in IVM (22). In this issue of the Research Topic, Bumroongthai et al. used this technique in mice to investigate if therapies aimed at preventing damage to coronary microvessels which accompanies opening of occluded coronary arteries; a surgical procedure performed to patients with myocardial infarction (23). The group reports that they perfected culturing of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) that when introduced into the mouse have the potential to limit this injury. This work involved the 3D culture of cells representing two distinct populations of bone marrow-derived MSCs. One line (CD317neg MSCs-Y201) turned out to be most effective as it limited neutrophil and platelet recruitment, especially when co-applied with heparin (23). These results carry an important clinical potential.Another organ that was explored by co-authors of this issue was the spleen. The study by Porto-Pedrosa et al. investigated the dynamics of immune development within this organ across postnatal period (16). The study reports that although the lymphoid tissue had similar structural arrangements in both newborn mice and adult individuals, they differed in the relative composition (cell number) of some of the myloid cellsmacrophages and monocytes, but not neutrophils. The important characteristic of the study was its detailed methodological approach, developing high dimensional intravital microscopy though the use of conventional confocal microscopes working as multi-channel imaging platforms (for details see ( 16)).The reviews and original papers published in volume II of our Research Topic touch upon historical aspect of IVM studies, refer to the most used techniques and present latest methodological achievements in the field of IVM. The intrinsic technical limitations or unawareness of dye applications, might limit imaging to few channels whereas the newest developments significantly improve this aspect as discussed in the papers. The Research Topic also presents information/work on the heart, spleen and brain imaging, a less frequently studied organs as opposed to well documented liver or cremaster muscle studies, revealing the expansion of potential application of IVM. Importantly, the original research papers reveal results which hold a therapeutic potential. Overall, this issue shows that intravital microscopy stands strong and still carries a potential to bring new discoveries and methodological advancement in the in vivo biomedical studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.021 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".