MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410251069 · doi:10.1016/j.nxmate.2025.100699

High-entropy oxide for enhanced supercapacitors and precise electrochemical detection of dopamine at nanomolar levels

2025· article· en· W4410251069 on OpenAlexaff
Elangovan Sivasurya, Francis Ashamary, Mari Elancheziyan, Jonnagaddala Harathi, M. Monika, Mani Arivazhagan, Narayanamoorthy Bhuvanendran, S. Philomina Mary, Raji Atchudan, Pramod K. Kalambate, Devaraj Manoj

Bibliographic record

VenueNext Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersKarpagam Academy of Higher Education
KeywordsSupercapacitorDopamineOxideElectrochemistryNanotechnologyMaterials scienceChemistryInternal medicineMedicineElectrodePhysical chemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ability to synthesize multi-metal elements into a single-component material at the nanoscale, known as high entropy oxide (HEO) is earning great attention, especially in the field of electrocatalysis. However, the present methods for the synthesis of HEO often involve non-noble, noble, or refractory elements, which require complicated synthesis methods, making the control of shape and size highly challenging. In this regard, a class of six dissimilar elements (Co, Ni, Mn, Mo, V and Zn) with combination of non-noble and refractory elements has been formed a new type of (Co 0.5 Ni 0.5 Mn 0.5 Mo 0.5 V 0.5 Zn 0.5 )O based HEO. The multi-element interaction and carbonization network enhance ion conductivity, boosting specific capacitance to 698.4 F.g⁻¹ , far surpassing conventional metal oxides. In addition, the HEO on screen printed electrode exhibited a notable increase in the oxidation peak current for the oxidation of dopamine, which can detect dopamine at nanomolar levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNext MaterialsSame topicSupercapacitor Materials and FabricationFrench-language works237,207