MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410259789 · doi:10.14719/pst.7416

Physiological and biochemical evaluation of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties in Andijan, Uzbekistan

2025· article· en· W4410259789 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hilola Matniyazova, Mamadaliyeva Nodira Isakovna, S T Yakubjanova

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Science Today · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPeanut Plant Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsAcademy of Sciences Republic of Uzbekistan
KeywordsArachis hypogaeaBiologyArachisBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study investigated the physiological and biochemical characteristics of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties cultivated in the Andijan region of Uzbekistan. Analysis results revealed that during the flowering phase, the Chinese-275 variety had the highest chlorophyll "a" content in leaves (1.66 ± 0.12 mg/g). In comparison, the Tashkent-112 variety showed the highest chlorophyll "b" content (0.63 ± 0.15 mg/g). The Chinese-275 variety also exhibited the highest carotenoid content (0.65 ± 0.04 mg/g). In the pod formation phase, the Chinese-275 variety again demonstrated the highest chlorophyll "a" content in plant leaves (2.39 ± 0.06 mg/g), the Tashkent-112 variety had the highest chlorophyll "b" content (1.49 ± 0.52 mg/g) and the Chinese-275 variety showed the highest carotenoid content (0.98 ± 0.01 mg/g). In our experiments examining the protein and fat content of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) seeds, the Salomat variety exhibited the highest protein content (26.704 ± 0.303 %). The highest fat content was observed in the Mumtoz variety (0.467 ± 0.002 mg/g). These findings

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant Science TodaySame topicPeanut Plant Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207