Effect of Core Stabilization Exercises on Balance and Postural Control in Children with Obesity and Overweight
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of core stabilization exercises (CSE) on balance and postural control in children with obesity and children with overweight. The study, which was planned as a quasi-experimental controlled study, was conducted with 46 children aged 7 to 10 years, 12 affected by obesity, 18 overweight, and 16 normal weight. Eight weeks of CSE were applied to all children. Children’s balance, postural control, and core region endurance were evaluated before and after the exercises with McGill core endurance tests, flamingo balance test (FBT), functional reach test (FRT), Y balance test (YBT). SPSS 25.0 package program was used for statistical analyses. The results showed that 8 weeks of CSE provided significant improvements in McGill core endurance tests, FBT, FRT, and YBT in children ( P < .05). Since excessively increased weight can cause a decrease in performance, it can also reduce the ability to achieve the greatest effect from the applied exercise approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".