Safety and efficacy of elafibranor in primary sclerosing cholangitis: The ELMWOOD phase II randomized-controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare, chronic liver disease. Elafibranor, a dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α/δ agonist, was investigated in the phase II ELMWOOD trial (NCT05627362). METHODS: This 12-week, double-blind trial enrolled adults with PSC and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥1.5× the upper limit of normal. The primary endpoint was elafibranor safety vs. placebo. Additional endpoints included relative mean change from baseline in ALP and enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score. RESULTS: A total of 68 participants (male: 54.4%; mean age: 46.3 years; inflammatory bowel disease: 55.9%) were randomized to elafibranor 80 mg (n = 22), elafibranor 120 mg (n = 23), or placebo (n = 23). At baseline, 70.6% were on ursodeoxycholic acid, 48.5% had ELF scores >9.8, and the mean ALP level was 369.5 U/L. At Week 12, rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and TEAEs leading to discontinuation in participants on elafibranor 80 mg, 120 mg, and placebo were 68.2%, 78.3%, and 69.6%, and 4.5%, 4.3%, and 8.7%, respectively. Serious TEAEs occurred only in participants on placebo (4.3%). Participants on elafibranor 80 mg and 120 mg had reductions in ALP vs. placebo (least squares mean treatment difference [95% CI]: -35.3% [-49.2, -21.4] and -54.7% [-68.3, -41.0], respectively). ALP normalization occurred only in participants on elafibranor 80 mg (9.1%) and 120 mg (17.4%). The LS mean treatment differences (95% CI) in change from baseline in ELF scores in participants on elafibranor 80 mg and 120 mg vs. placebo were -0.19 (-0.52, +0.15) and -0.28 (-0.62, +0.06), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Elafibranor was well tolerated in people with PSC and associated with greater biochemical improvements over 12 weeks compared with placebo. A greater magnitude of response was observed with elafibranor 120 mg compared with 80 mg. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: For people with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), there is a need for a well-tolerated and effective treatment that will enhance quality of life, prevent disease progression, and improve long-term outcomes. Here, we present results from the double-blind period of the phase II ELMWOOD trial in PSC, wherein elafibranor, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α/δ agonist, demonstrated a favorable safety profile, provided greater biochemical improvements over 12 weeks compared with placebo, and appeared to stabilize markers of fibrosis and improve pruritus. These findings support larger and longer term investigations of elafibranor to explore its therapeutic potential as a treatment for people with PSC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".