MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410269625 · doi:10.55041/ijsrem47560

Face Recognition Attendance System

2025· article· en· W4410269625 on OpenAlexaff
Harsh Sharma

Bibliographic record

VenueINTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacial recognition systemAttendanceComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePsychologyPattern recognition (psychology)Political science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: The Face Recognition Attendance System represents a modern biometric-based solution specifically designed to automate the process of tracking attendance using facial recognition technology. This innovative system addresses and resolves several limitations and inefficiencies that are commonly associated with traditional attendance methods, including manual roll calls, sign-in sheets, and the use of RFID cards. By minimizing human intervention, it significantly reduces the occurrence of human errors and prevents fraudulent practices such as proxy attendance. The system integrates real-time image acquisition, facial detection algorithms, and advanced deep learning models to ensure a high level of accuracy and reliability in personal identification. Furthermore, the interface of the application is intentionally designed to be user-friendly, making it easy for administrators and users to operate and manage the system effectively. The inclusion of a structured and optimized database architecture ensures streamlined data storage, retrieval, and management. Additionally, the contactless mode of operation aligns with current health and safety guidelines by minimizing physical interaction, thereby supporting hygienic practices in public and private institutions. Through comprehensive testing across a variety of environmental and user conditions, the system has proven to maintain consistent performance and robustness. Future improvements under consideration involve the incorporation of features such as real-time face mask detection, integration with cloud-based storage systems for scalable data access, and the application of more sophisticated artificial intelligence capabilities. This system is particularly suitable for deployment in educational institutions, corporate offices, and industrial sectors where secure, efficient, and tamper-proof attendance recording mechanisms are essential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENTSame topicFace recognition and analysisFrench-language works237,207