MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Airway Lipopolysaccharide Predicts Future Pseudomonadota Colonization and is Associated With Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction in Lung Transplant Recipients Without Positive Cultures

2025· article· en· W4410271286 on OpenAlexaff
R. Ramendra, C. Chamillo, E Floris, Andrew T. Sage, Ella Huszti, Shaf Keshavjee, F. D’Ovidio, Bryan Coburn, T. Martinu

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLungLung transplantationAirwayLipopolysaccharideColonizationImmunologyIntensive care medicineInternal medicineMicrobiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Pathogens in the phylum Pseudomonadota – including Haemophilus, Neisseria, and Pseudomonas – are commonly implicated in lung infections and exacerbation of chronic lung diseases. Colonization of the lung allograft with Pseudomonadota has been previously associated with lung allograft inflammation and increased risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Our group and others have previously shown that, despite treatment, lung transplant recipients (LTRs) with positive Pseudomonadota bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cultures within the first-year post-transplant are at an increased risk of adverse outcomes. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a component of the gram-negative cell wall and potent stimulator of the host immune response. We have previously shown that BAL LPS measured at 3-months post-transplant, in LTRs without positive BAL cultures, was associated with concurrent Pseudomonadota colonization and increased risk of future CLAD. Herein, we sought to: 1) validate our previous findings and 2) investigate whether BAL LPS could predict future Pseudomonadota infection. Methods: A total of 280 consecutive adult LTRs with available BAL at 3-months post-transplant and at least four post-transplant pulmonary function tests were included in this study. LPS was measured in BAL supernatant using the Limulus amebocyte lysate assay. Cox-PH models were used to assess the relationship between BAL LPS and time to CLAD. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between BAL LPS and concurrent as well as future BAL Pseudomonadota culture positivity. Results: BAL LPS was higher in samples that concurrently were culture positive for gram negative bacteria (p=0.05) and specifically Pseudomonadota organisms (p<0.001). BAL LPS was associated with an increased risk of CLAD among all patients [HR 1.27 (1.12-1.45), p<0.001] and specifically among patients who had culture-negative BAL [1.33 (1.15-1.55), p<0.001]. Among LTRs with culture negative BAL at 3 months, BAL LPS predicted future BAL Pseudomonadota culture positivity within the next three months [OR 1.79 (1.31-2.48), p<0.001]. In this group, BAL LPS in the highest tertile was able to predict BAL Pseudomonadota culture positivity within the next three months with 85% sensitivity and 72% specificity. Conclusions: We substantiated our previous findings that elevated BAL LPS measured at 3-months post-transplant, even in the absence of positive cultures, was associated with an increased risk of CLAD. Moreover, elevated BAL LPS was able to predict future presence of pulmonary Pseudomonadota cultures. Future studies are needed to determine whether early treatment of elevated BAL LPS can prevent future Pseudomonadota infection and prolong allograft survival.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine→Same topicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→