MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Contractile Properties of Intrapulmonary Airway Smooth Muscle in Fatal Asthma

2025· article· en· W4410271558 on OpenAlexaff
Rafael Intrevado, Linda Kachmar, Anne‐Marie Lauzon

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsChristie (Canada)McGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsthmaAirwayIntensive care medicineCardiologyInternal medicineAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale: Asthma affects over 200 million people worldwide (WHO 2019). It is characterized by airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), an excessive airway narrowing in response to benign stimuli. Evidence is accumulating that supports that asthmatic intrapulmonary airway smooth muscle (IP-ASM) is hypercontractile. IP-ASM has been shown to produce a greater stress (force/cross-sectional area) in asthmatic subjects and in the equine model of asthma compared to healthy controls. Maximum shortening velocity (Vmax) has also been shown to be increased in several human and animal models of asthma during acute exposure to inflammatory cells and mediators. The contractile properties of fatal asthmatics remain ill studied. Given that fatal asthma is considered more representative of poorly controlled asthma rather than severe asthma, we hypothesised that the contractile properties of fatal asthmatics would be comparable to those of mild to moderate asthmatics. To address this question, we compared the mechanics of control, mild asthmatic, and fatal asthmatic IP-ASM. Methods: Intrapulmonary airways 2-5mm in diameter from healthy control, mild asthmatic, and fatal asthmatic donor lungs (NDRI & IIAM) were dissected to yield small strips of ASM cleared of epithelium and cartilage. These strips were placed in an organ bath, and dose responses to methacholine (MCh) and isoproterenol (Iso) were performed. Vmax was also measured by the quick release technique during a MCh contraction. Data are from 25 ASM strips from 4 healthy control lungs, 50 strips from 5 mild asthmatic lungs, and 28 strips from 3 fatal asthmatic lungs. Results and Discussion: Relaxation of IP-ASM strips from fatal asthmatic lungs was significant less relative to healthy controls (32.1% ± 2.5 vs. 63.4% ± 5.7, P<0.0001) and mild asthmatic lungs (32.1% ± 2. 6 vs. 67.6% ± 1.6, P<0.0001). Interestingly, Vmax of fatal asthmatic was significantly lower compared to asthmatic IP-ASM (0.132 lengths/s ± 0.006 vs. 0.179 lengths/s ± 0.001, P=0.0017), with a similar trend when compared to control IP-ASM (0.132 lengths/s ± 0.006 vs. 0.166 lengths/s ± 0.010, P>0.05). The lower Vmax observed in the fatal asthmatics could be explained by their corticosteroids intake upon hospitalization, as there is evidence of their ability to decrease Vmax in equine asthma. However, it is interesting to see the refractiveness of the IP-ASM relaxation to these medications. Thus, our results suggest that future efforts should focus on the persistent lack of relaxation of IP-ASM in uncontrolled and fatal asthma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine→Same topicAsthma and respiratory diseases→French-language works237,207→