MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Buccal Mucosal Reflectance Oximeter Accurately Measures Arterial Oxyhemoglobin Saturation and Pulse Rate

2025· article· en· W4410273016 on OpenAlexaff
Clark Sheldon Snow, Matiram Pun, Shane Magnison-Benoit, Thomas R. Tripp, A. M. Clarke, Sophie Berghmans, Bruce Hansen, Leo Transfiguracion, Giovanni Di Simone, MING-LAI LAI, Jean M. Rawling, Soumyajit Roy, Saleema Adatia, Erin V. Mosca, John E. Remmers, Marc J. Poulin

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBuccal administrationReflectivityPulse (music)Pulse oximetryPulse ratePhotoplethysmogramDentistryOpticsAnesthesiaInternal medicineBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale: Pulse oximeter devices (SpO2) suitable for multi-night monitoring of arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation (SaO2) are not readily available despite a need to monitor SaO2 decreases in patients with sleep apnea and pulmonary diseases during sleep. The objective of the current study was to assess the SpO2 and pulse rate accuracy of a buccal mucosal oximeter embedded into a custom-fitted overlay of the upper teeth by comparison to a gold standard (CO-oximeter SaO2 and 3-lead electrocardiogram [ECG] heart rate). Methods: Twelve healthy participants (four females) aged 30.7±6.7 (22-39) years underwent a progressive stepwise desaturation protocol consisting of six 7-minute stages of decreasing levels of end-tidal oxygen (PETO2; 90.1, 63.8, 53.0, 46.4, 41.6, and 37.9 Torr) to achieve a range of SaO2 from approximately 97-70% during semi-recumbent, non-motion conditions. PETO2 and PETCO2 were controlled by a dynamic end-tidal forcing function system. Arterial blood was drawn and analyzed using a Radiometer ABL800 CO-oximeter in the last three minutes of each stage. SpO2 and pulse rate values from the buccal mucosal oximeter were compared with CO-oximeter values of SaO2 and ECG heart rate, respectively. Results: SaO2 values were evenly distributed over the range of 97-67%. Analysis of 325 CO-oximeter SaO2/buccal mucosal oximeter SpO2 data pairs yielded: r = 0.95; bias = 0.72; and accuracy root-mean-square (ARMS) = 2.94%. Analysis of 346 ECG heart rate/buccal mucosal oximeter pulse rate data pairs yielded: r = 0.99, bias = 0.30; and ARMS = 2.08 bpm. Conclusion: The buccal mucosal oximeter accurately measured SpO2 and pulse rate, as shown by good agreement with a gold standard, over a wide range of arterial hypoxemia. Such clinically acceptable accuracy indicates that this novel reflectance oximeter may prove useful in the management of patients with sleep-induced hypoxemia by providing multi-night monitoring of SaO2. Additionally, the intraoral placement of the oximeter might overcome some limitations of other pulse oximeters, as the buccal mucosa is highly vascularized, temperature regulated, protected from ambient light, and appears to lack melanin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineSame topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207