MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Predicting Fatal Cardiovascular Outcomes: The Role of Sleep Related Variables

2025· article· en· W4410273654 on OpenAlexaff
Shaghayegh Chavoshian, Saurabh Saha

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSleep (system call)Intensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale: For more than three decades, cardiovascular diseases have consistently been the leading cause of death worldwide. Inconsistent or insufficient sleep duration is linked to a higher risk of developing or experiencing fatal cardiovascular outcome. However, specific factors that affect fatal cardiovascular outcomes are still unclear. Methods: We analyzed an open-access cohort (Sleep Heart Health Study) of participants with cardiovascular disease to identify various factors that could predict the number of days from their sleep study to death. To perform this, we implemented several models using sleep related features from overnight polysomnography (PSG), demographics, respiratory metrics, health conditions, and chronic disorders to predict the year of death. We categorized the time to death into the 4 following classes: 1) 0-3 years, 2) 3-6 years, 3) 6-9 years, and 4) 9-13 years. We then selected features based on their importance scores derived using the Random Forest technique. Multiple classification models were trained, including Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Logistic Regression, and Naïve Bayse. The dataset was first split into 80% training data and 20% testing data. Consequently, hyperparameter tuning was conducted using grid search methods to maximize the accuracy. Ultimately, the best-performing model was selected based on the highest performance scores. Results: We studied 355 subjects, including 193 males, with an average age of 75.8 ± 7.5 years and a BMI of 27.5 ± 4.8. All subjects were deceased from cardiovascular disease following their initial sleep study after an average of 2495.7 ± 1200.6 days. We extracted 320 features to predict cardiovascular-related mortality. The best predictive model was KNN classifier, achieving an accuracy of 82.6%, a precision of 81.4%, a recall of 82.1%, and a F1 score of 81.52% (Figure 1). In terms of feature importance, a lower percentage of time spent in stage 2 of non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, lower average oxygen saturation during NREM sleep, reduced sleep efficiency (measured as the ratio of total sleep duration to in-bed period), higher BMI, and worsen mental health condition were linked to increased risk of earlier death by 5%. Conclusion: This study was a proof of concept to indicate the significant role of specific sleep variables from PSG can be used as a predictor of mortality due to cardiovascular disease. Future studies should explore the benefits of early interventions and their potential to reduce mortality for the at-risk populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine→Same topicSleep and related disorders→French-language works237,207→