MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Machine-Learning Derived Relationships Between Sleep Variables and Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure and Cheyne-Stokes Respiration

2025· article· en· W4410273738 on OpenAlexaff
Shaghayegh Chavoshian, Shin’ichi Ishiwata, Clodagh M. Ryan, Christian Horváth, Alexander G. Logan, John S. Floras, Douglas Bradley

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCheyne–Stokes respirationMedicineHeart failureRespirationSleep (system call)CardiologyInternal medicineIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: In heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients, Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) cycle length (CL) and lung-to-finger-circulation-time (LFCT) are directly related to circulation time and inversely proportional to cardiac output. It is therefore possible that CSR characteristics and LFCT may be related to mortality risk in patients with HFrEF. We hypothesized, in patients with CSR from the ADVENT-HF trial, that since longer CSR CL and LFCT indicate worse cardiac function, longer CSR cycling characteristics and LFCT are associated with higher mortality. Methods: In 195 patients with HFrEF (of whom 59 died over a maximum follow-up of 5 years), from 20 CSR cycles (10 in each of the first and last half of the night), we averaged CSR CL from the beginning of 1 apnea to the start of the next as well as apnea length (AL), hyperpnea length (HL), LFCT, respiratory rate, arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), time to peak tidal volume (TPTV) during hyperpnea, and AHI (Figure 1). Clinical variables entered included sex, age, BMI, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation, New York Heart Association class, and peak-flow-adaptive-servo-ventilation treatment. A random forest feature selection technique was employed. The algorithm then built multiple decision trees, each considering different combinations of variables to predict mortality. The importance of a feature is determined by how much the mortality predictions worsen when the values of a feature are randomly mixed. A score above 0.05 indicates importance. Subsequently, we selected the most influential one-third of the features. We developed various classifiers using two distinct datasets: one based solely on sleep-related features and the other incorporating a broader range of variables, including demographic, cardiac, and sleep-related factors. The models were tested on 20% of unseen data for evaluation. Results: The most significant predictors of mortality, when using only sleep-related variables, included the average minimum (SaO2) (0.10), CL (0.09), LFCT (0.08), and AHI (0.07), resulting in a prediction accuracy of 71.8%. When incorporating cardiac and demographic variables, key predictors included TPTV (0.11), CL (0.10), LVEF (0.09), LFCT (0.09), age (0.09), and the average maximum SaO2 (0.08), leading to an improved prediction accuracy of 79.5%. Conclusion: These findings suggest that besides age and LVEF, CSR features related to cardiac output are significant predictors of mortality in HF patients with CSR. Our results underscore the potential significance of detailed polysomnographic analyses to assist in mortality risk stratification in this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineSame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207