MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Two-year Efficacy and Safety of Benralizumab in the Treatment of Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis

2025· article· en· W4410274085 on OpenAlexaff
Michael E. Wechsler, Parameswaran Nair, Nader Khalidi, B. Terrier, B. Hellmich, Arnaud Bourdin, David Jayne, David J. Jackson, Florence Roufosse, Christian Pagnoux, U. Specks, Lena Börjesson Sjö, C.N. Ho, Maria Jison, Christopher McCrae, S. Necander, Eva Rodríguez‐Suárez, A. Shavit, C. Walton, Peter A. Merkel

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkMount Sinai HospitalMcMaster UniversitySt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBenralizumabGranulomatosis with polyangiitisEosinophilicDermatologyImmunologyInternal medicinePathologyVasculitisAsthmaDiseaseEosinophilMepolizumab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale: The 1-year double-blind period of the MANDARA trial (NCT04157348) demonstrated non-inferiority of benralizumab to mepolizumab for achieving remission, in adults with relapsing/refractory eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). Here, we report the 2-year combined double-blind and ongoing open-label extension (OLE) data. Methods: On completion of the double-blind period (n=136/140) comparing benralizumab 1x30mg versus mepolizumab 3x100mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks, patients were invited to enter the OLE where they continued benralizumab (benra/benra) or switched from mepolizumab to benralizumab (mepo/benra). Endpoints included remission (Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score=0 and oral glucocorticoid [OGC[ dose ≤4 mg/day), OGC use, relapse, blood eosinophil count (bEOS), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6), pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (pre-BD FEV1), and safety. Results: In total, 128 patients entered the OLE (n=66 benra/benra, n=62 mepo/benra; mean age 52.8 years; 60.2% female), and 119 completed OLE Year 1. Baseline characteristics of those entering the OLE were similar to the double-blind period. At Week 104, over 60% in both groups (41 [62.1%] benra/benra and 42 [67.7%] mepo/benra patients) achieved remission. During the OLE, 51 (77.3%) benra/benra and 42 (67.7%) mepo/benra patients had no relapses. The percentage of benra/benra patients who discontinued OGCs was similar at Weeks 49-52 (27 [40.9%]) and Weeks 101-104 (29 [43.9%]), while the percentage increased for mepo/benra patients between Weeks 49-52 (16 [25.8%]) and Weeks 101-104 (27 [43.5%]; Figure). The median (IQR) OGC dose at Weeks 101-104 was 0.5 (0,5) in benra/benra and 1.36 (0,5) mg/day in mepo/benra patients. The median (IQR) bEOS in benra/benra patients was 20 (10,40) cells/µL at both Weeks 52 and 100; bEOS were depleted in mepo/benra patients from 70 (40,90) cells/µL to 20 (10,50) cells/µL by 4 weeks after switching. Mean (SD) ACQ-6 scores were 0.64 (0.78) in benra/benra patients and 0.60 (0.76) in mepo/benra patients at Week 104 compared with 1.39 (1.18) and 1.11 (0.95) at baseline. Mean (SD) pre-BD FEV1 was 2.59 (0.90) L versus 2.62 (0.84) L in benra/benra versus mepo/benra patients at Week 52, and 2.61 (0.90) versus 2.63 (0.81) L, at Week 100. Safety of mepolizumab and benralizumab was consistent with their known profiles. Conclusions: In patients with EGPA receiving benralizumab, remission rates, OGC discontinuation, and bEOS depletion were durable over 104 weeks with low relapse rates, and without loss of asthma control or lung function decline. Additional bEOS depletion and OGC sparing was observed in patients switching from mepolizumab to benralizumab.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineSame topicEosinophilic Disorders and SyndromesFrench-language works237,207