MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410274505 · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2025.106952

Fatty acid binding proteins and their involvement in anxiety and mood disorders

2025· review· en· W4410274505 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew Jones, Taygun C. Uzuneser, Steven R. Laviolette

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurobiology of Disease · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityLawson Health Research Institute
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAnxietyMoodMood disordersPsychologyNeuroscienceComputational biologyBiochemistryChemistryClinical psychologyBiologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anxiety and mood disorders represent the most prevalent neuropsychiatric conditions. Nevertheless, current pharmacotherapies often have a host of adverse side effects. Emerging evidence suggests modulation of lipid signaling pathways - particularly those involved in the endocannabinoid (eCB) system, may offer promising new targets for the treatment of anxiety and depression. Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and their metabolic derivatives, including the eCB ligands, have garnered significant attention for their roles in neuropsychiatric disease mechanisms. Intracellular transportation of these lipids is facilitated by fatty acid binding proteins (FABP), which are increasingly recognized as key regulators of lipid signaling. Accumulating evidence indicates that FABPs may impact the development of neuropsychiatric disorders by mediating the signaling pathways of PUFAs and eCB ligands. In this review, we investigate the role of FABPs in two major categories of neuropsychiatric conditions - anxiety disorders and clinical depression. We begin by examining several neuropathophysiological mechanisms through which FABPs can impact these conditions, focusing on their role as lipid chaperones. These mechanisms include the trafficking of eCB ligands, as well as oleoylethanolamide and palmitoylethanolamide; modulation of inflammatory responses through PUFA transport and PPAR activation; regulation of PUFA availability to support neurogenesis; influence on stress-related pathways, including NMDA receptor activation and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis; and the facilitation of dopamine receptor trafficking and localization. Next, we discuss preclinical evidence linking FABP function to anxiety- and depression-related behaviours. Finally, we propose that pharmacologically targeting FABP-mediated pathways holds considerable potential as a novel therapeutic strategy for addressing the symptoms associated with mood and anxiety disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurobiology of DiseaseSame topicTryptophan and brain disordersFrench-language works237,207